Professor: Dr. Wayne Cook | Director: Dr. Ted Rogers
"Be holy, for I am holy." — 1 Peter 1:16 (NKJV)
Welcome to Pastoral & Christian Ethics. Please register before beginning Unit 2.
In the first unit we said that Christian ethics measures every action against God's own character. Now we must ask the obvious next question: what is that character, and why should it be the measure of anything? If you do not settle this, everything that follows will float free of its anchor. So let us put the anchor down deep. The ground of all ethics is the holiness of God — not a rule He keeps, but the very purity of who He is. "Be holy, for I am holy" (1 Peter 1:16, citing Leviticus). Notice the logic of that command. God does not say, be holy because holiness works, or because the community needs it. He says, be holy because I am. The reason for the standard is the nature of God Himself.
Let me give you a picture I have carried since boyhood. My father grew up on a farm, and in those days a farmer had to do his own carpentry, so for a few years he made his living as a carpenter. In our garage there were some very old tools, and one of them was a plumb line made of brass. It was a simple thing — a weight on a string — but it did one job perfectly: hung against a wall, gravity pulled it true, and it showed you at once whether the wall was straight. The plumb line does not argue and it does not flatter; it simply does not lie. When the Lord showed Amos a plumb line set in the midst of His people, that was the point. Ethics is not finally a matter of our preferences, our traditions, or how a thing looks from the outside. There is a standard, fixed and true, and it measures us whether we consent to it or not. The whole of Christian ethics begins here: not with what we feel is right, but with the straight line God Himself has set beside our lives.
This protects us from two ancient errors, and I want you to be able to name them, because your people will stumble into both. The first error says that things are good because God arbitrarily commands them — that He could have called murder righteous if He had chosen to, and good is simply whatever the Almighty happens to decree. That makes God a tyrant and goodness a coin-flip. The second error says that things are good by some standard above God, to which even He must bow — which makes God no longer God, but a servant of a higher law. The biblical answer slices cleanly between them: a thing is good because it reflects the unchanging character of God. Goodness is neither arbitrary nor above Him. It is Him, expressed. His commands are not random and they are not borrowed; they are the overflow of His own perfect nature.
From this single truth flows a principle we will lean on again and again in this course, one I have taught for years and built into our Systematic Theology: every human being is made in the image of God, and therefore every human being possesses a worth that cannot be earned, diminished, or revoked. "So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them" (Genesis 1:27). That worth does not rise and fall with a man's usefulness, his health, his morality, or his agreement with us. It is irreducible, because it is grounded not in him but in the God whose image he bears. Hold onto that. When we reach the sanctity of life, the treatment of the poor, and the discipline of the sinning brother, this is the principle we will be applying.
If God's character is the standard, the law is the place where that character was written down for us in words. God did not leave us to guess at His holiness. He built a moral order into the very creation, and then He stated it plainly at Sinai. The Ten Commandments are not ten arbitrary rules; they are a portrait of God's character translated into the shape of a human life — one God, no idols, His name honored, His day kept, and then the horizontal commands that protect life, marriage, property, truth, and the contented heart.
Conservative teachers have long found it useful to distinguish three strands within the law of Moses: the ceremonial law that governed sacrifice and temple, the civil law that ordered the nation of Israel, and the moral law that expresses God's unchanging will. The ceremonial pointed forward to Christ and is fulfilled in Him; the civil was given to a particular nation in a particular time; but the moral law, rooted in God's own nature, abides. This is why we still teach the Ten Commandments and no longer offer lambs. Learn this distinction well, because much confusion in the church comes from collapsing it — either binding people to laws Christ has fulfilled, or discarding moral commands that still stand.
Then came the Lord Jesus, and here a careful word is needed, for many imagine that He came to soften or set aside the law. He says the opposite. "Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill" (Matthew 5:17). And in the Sermon on the Mount He does not lower the law's demand; He drives it inward to the heart. You have heard it said, do not murder — but I say, do not even nurse the anger that kills. You have heard, do not commit adultery — but I say, do not even harbor the lust that betrays. Christ takes the law off the surface of behavior and presses it down into the thoughts and intents, exactly where 2 Timothy told us the Word reaches. This is progressive revelation at its summit: not a new and contradictory standard, but the full unveiling of what the law always meant. The One who gave the law on the mountain now expounds it on another, and then goes to a third to fulfill its every demand in His own body.
Now we arrive at the hinge of the whole Christian life, and if a man gets this wrong he will either despair or grow proud, and often both by turns. The question is this: once we see the law in all its inward, heart-searching demand, how can any of us hope to keep it? And the honest biblical answer is that, left to ourselves, we cannot. "There is none righteous, no, not one" (Romans 3:10). The law was never given as a ladder to climb to God. One of its great purposes is to be the mirror that shows us our filth and drives us, despairing of ourselves, to the cross. The law diagnoses; it cannot cure.
The cure is the gospel. In Christ, the demand of the law is satisfied and its penalty paid, and the believer is declared righteous as a free gift. But the gospel does not stop at the courtroom. The same grace that justifies also goes to work within, and here is the truth that rescues ethics from being a grim exercise in willpower: holiness is the fruit of the Spirit, not the achievement of the flesh. "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control" (Galatians 5:22–23). Mark the word — fruit, not works. Fruit is not manufactured by the branch gritting its teeth; it is borne as the life of the vine flows through it. Christian character is grown, by the Spirit, in a soul united to Christ.
This is why we held so firmly in Unit 1 to the order of grace before obedience, and why we will hold it all the way through. We do not obey in order to be accepted; we have been accepted, and therefore we obey, and the very power to obey is itself a gift. Get that order backward and you produce either a Pharisee or a wreck. Keep it straight and obedience becomes what it was always meant to be — not the anxious payment of a debt, but the glad response of a son to the Father who has already run down the road to embrace him.
Two practical matters remain before we move into the work of ministry itself. The first is how to handle the Word so that we apply it rightly and do not twist it. We hold to what has been called the grammatical-historical method, which is a careful name for a humble practice: we ask what the human author, carried along by the Spirit, actually meant to say to his original readers, in the ordinary sense of his words and the setting of his time — and only then do we ask how that abiding truth bears on us. We do not make the text a mirror for our own preferences or a wax nose to be bent toward whatever we already wished to do. The pastor who proves his point by ripping a verse from its context has not honored the Word; he has used it. And a congregation trained by such handling will learn to do the same to one another. Read the verse in its paragraph, the paragraph in its book, and the book in the whole counsel of God.
The second matter is how to think about the ethical systems the world has built, which you studied in part in Unit 1. The philosophers have largely sorted themselves into three families: those who locate the good in character (the virtue traditions), those who locate it in duty and rule (the deontologists), and those who locate it in consequences (the various utilitarians). Here is the discerning Christian's verdict. Each of the three has hold of something real, and it is no accident, for each is borrowing from the moral order God actually built. Scripture cares about character — it is the whole point of the fruit of the Spirit. Scripture cares about duty — God issues commands and expects obedience. Scripture cares about consequences — love weighs the effect of its actions on a neighbor. The failure of each system is never that it sees nothing true; it is that it tears its one fragment loose from God and tries to make that fragment carry the whole weight of morality alone. The Christian does not choose one of the three and reject the others. He gathers up the truth in each — virtue, duty, and consequence — and orders all of it under the authority of God's revelation, where it finally belongs.
Certificate students: Answer 1–20 (the fill-in-the-blank questions are for review). Associate students: 1–20 and the 10 fill-in-the-blank. M.Div. / Th.M. students: all 30 and the fill-in-the-blank. 90% required to pass. If you don't pass, review the lesson and try again after a short pause.
M.Div. and Th.M.: all five assigned readings are part of the course. Their separate exam is required after activation; see its page for the current rule. Honors remains optional and does not replace the exam.
Open Course Readings →