How We Got the Bible

Supplemental Reading Room

Canon, Manuscripts, Transmission, and Historical Evidence

Reading different theological perspectives. Historical readings express their authors' perspectives, including Arminian and Reformed or Calvinist traditions. Inclusion does not make an author's position settled CTS doctrine. Read with Scripture and the assigned material. A supported answer from another evangelical perspective should be assessed on its reasoning, not penalized simply for differing from the author. If an automated score rejects such an answer, ask CTS for review.

Master’s Assigned Readings (all five)

M.Div. and Th.M. students read all five assigned selections and take their separate exam after activation. The test page states the current rule; valid earlier completions remain valid.

Optional Honors (choose three)

Honors is optional on every track. Certificate and Associate students may read three honors selections without a required-reading exam. Honors does not replace either master’s exam.

The Master's textbook test: read Angus, The Bible Hand-Book (assigned excerpts), then take its test: twenty fill-in-the-blank questions, drawn from forty; eighteen right passes. Each answer is marked right or wrong at once. Correct answers and explanations are available after the attempt passes. It is separate from the reading test on the five digests below: passing one does not pass the other. On the M.Div. and Th.M. tracks both tests are being introduced; each test's page says whether it is in force yet. Until then any student may take them, and a pass is kept in your record.
The Master's reading test: separate from the honors invitation below. Honors asks you to read any three of these digests; the Master's test covers all five. It has twenty fill-in-the-blank questions, four from each reading, drawn from forty; eighteen right passes. Each answer is marked right or wrong at once; correct answers and explanations are available after the attempt passes. You may try again after a short wait. The test is being introduced: its page says whether it is in force yet. Until then any student may take it, and a pass is kept in your record.
Honors option: Complete any three of the five readings below. These readings supplement the course and do not replace its units or examinations.
On this site: Each of the five readings is a Chapala Theological Seminary digest, written by CTS, available in English, Spanish and French here on the site — every one opens directly from this page, with nothing to download. The digests are CTS-authored teaching that rests on the great public-domain classics on the Bible's history (William Henry Green, Brooke Foss Westcott, Frederic G. Kenyon, F. H. A. Scrivener, John William Burgon, Ira Maurice Price, George Rawlinson, A. H. Sayce, Camden M. Cobern, and others); those classic works are freely available online for any who wish to read them in full.
Selected: 0 of 3
Reading 1 · The Old Testament Canon

The Making of the Old Testament Canon

What “canon” means; the Old Testament as a library written over a thousand years under one divine Author; the key principle of recognition, not invention (the people recognized God’s voice, they did not confer authority); how the Law, Prophets, and Writings were gathered; the witness of Jesus, who sealed the Hebrew Scriptures; the question of the Apocrypha handled with respect; the providence that preserved it; and the Word that points to Christ.

CTS DIGESTRead the full digest — opens right here
The Chapala Theological Seminary digest — an original summary written by CTS, available in English, Spanish and French, readable offline. This is the CTS digest, not the full original source text.

The Making of the Old Testament Canon

A Chapala Theological Seminary reading — how the books of the Old Testament came to be received as the Word of God

A CTS-authored survey, anchored in the classic public-domain works on the canon of Scripture (William Henry Green, Ira Maurice Price, and others), and in Scripture.

  • How We Got the Bible
  • The Old Testament Canon
  • Recognized, Not Invented
  • Anchored in classics
A word before you read. Every Bible begins with a question: how did these particular books come to be recognized as the Word of God? This reading traces the making of the Old Testament canon — not as books that men made holy by a vote, but as the writings in which God's people heard the voice of God, and which they received, preserved, and passed down. It is a story of divine gift and faithful recognition.

1.What "Canon" Means

The word "canon" comes from an old word meaning a rule, a measuring-rod, or a standard. When we speak of the canon of Scripture, we mean the collection of books that the people of God have recognized as the inspired and authoritative Word of God — the true standard, or rule, for what we are to believe and how we are to live. So to ask "how did we get the Bible?" is really to ask two questions. First, how did these particular books come to be written? And second, how did they come to be recognized and gathered together as the sacred Scriptures, marked off from all other writings as the very Word of God? This is the study we call the history of the canon, and it is a worthy and strengthening study for every believer. For our Bible did not simply fall from heaven complete in a single moment; God gave it to His people gradually, over long ages, and guided them to recognize and preserve it. To understand something of that history is to see the care and faithfulness of God in giving us His Word, and to hold our Bibles with deeper reverence and gratitude. We begin, in this reading, with the Old Testament — the Scriptures that Israel received, and that our Lord Himself read and honored.

2.A Library Written Over Ages

The first thing to grasp is that the Old Testament is not a single book but a whole library, written across many centuries by many different human authors, yet all under the inspiration of the one God. Moses gave the foundational books of the Law. After him came the long line of the prophets, from Samuel and the writers of Israel's history down to Isaiah, Jeremiah, and the rest, speaking the word of the Lord to their generations. And there were the poets and the wise — David and the psalmists pouring out their praise and prayer, Solomon and the sages setting down the wisdom of God for daily life. The Hebrews came to speak of their Scriptures in three great divisions: the Law, the Prophets, and the Writings. Over the course of roughly a thousand years, book was added to book, each given in its own time and setting, until the whole Old Testament stood complete. And through it all, one divine Author was at work behind the many human ones, so that what we hold is not merely a collection of ancient Hebrew literature, but a unified revelation, the unfolding Word of the living God, given piece by piece across the generations of His people.

3.Recognized, Not Invented

Now we come to the most important principle of all, without which the whole subject is misunderstood. The books of the Old Testament did not become the Word of God because some council or committee decided to grant them that honor. They were the Word of God from the moment they were given, because God Himself had inspired them; and what the people of God did was not to confer authority upon them, but to recognize the authority they already possessed. This distinction is everything. The canon was received, not created; discovered, not invented. Just as a person recognizes the voice of a dear friend without having to be told whose voice it is, so the people of God, taught by His Spirit, recognized in these writings the unmistakable voice of their God, and bowed to their authority. A book was not made Scripture by human approval; it was acknowledged as Scripture because it carried in itself the marks and the authority of God's own Word. The role of God's people, then, was a humble and receptive one: not to sit in judgment over the Scriptures, deciding which should be authoritative, but to listen, to recognize, and to submit to the Word that God had spoken.

4.How the Old Testament Was Gathered

How, then, did this recognition and gathering actually take place? The process was gradual, unfolding alongside the giving of the books themselves. The Law of Moses was received as sacred and authoritative from very early times; it was laid up beside the ark, read publicly to the people, and treated as the binding word of God. As the prophets arose and spoke and wrote, their words too were recognized as the word of the Lord and preserved. And the Writings — the Psalms and the books of wisdom and the rest — were likewise gathered and honored among the sacred books. Careful conservative scholars, tracing this history, have shown how the collection grew and was guarded by the covenant community across the generations, each portion recognized and added as God gave it. By the time of the close of the Old Testament period, and certainly by the days of our Lord, the Hebrew Scriptures existed as a recognized and settled collection, well known and universally received among the Jewish people as the Word of God. This was the Bible that Jesus and His apostles knew and used — a completed and acknowledged body of sacred writings, ready to bear witness to the Christ who was to come.

5.The Witness of Jesus

For the Christian, the strongest of all confirmations of the Old Testament comes from the Lord Jesus Christ Himself. Throughout His ministry, Jesus received the Hebrew Scriptures as the true and authoritative Word of God. He quoted them constantly, settled disputes by appealing to them, and declared that they could not be broken. He spoke of the Scriptures in their familiar threefold shape when He said that everything written about Him "in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms" must be fulfilled. He referred to the whole sweep of the Old Testament from its first martyr to its last, marking out its extent. And His apostles followed Him in this, treating the Old Testament as the very oracles of God, given by the Holy Spirit through holy men who "spoke as they were moved" by Him. This witness of Christ and His apostles is, for those who trust Him, decisive. The same Lord whom we confess as the Son of God set His seal upon the Old Testament Scriptures, receiving them as the Word of His Father. We may therefore hold the Old Testament with full confidence, knowing that our Savior Himself honored it as the Word of God.

6.The Question of the Apocrypha

Here we should touch, gently and honestly, on a matter about which sincere Christians have long held differing views. In the centuries between the Old and New Testaments, various other Jewish writings appeared, often called the Apocrypha. Many of these were valued, read, and found useful for instruction and history, and they cast helpful light on the period. Christians have not all agreed on their exact standing. Some branches of the church have included a number of these books within the Old Testament, holding them in a secondary place; others, following the shape of the Hebrew Scriptures received by the Jewish people, have not counted them as part of the canon proper. This is an old and honest difference, and it should be spoken of with respect for all who love the Lord. The courses of this seminary, using translations such as the New King James Version in English and the Reina-Valera Gómez in Spanish, follow the Hebrew canon of thirty-nine books as the Old Testament. What is worth remembering above the difference is the very broad agreement: across the many branches of the Christian family, there is deep and shared reverence for the great body of the Old Testament Scriptures as the Word of God, the writings that prepared the way for Christ.

7.The Providence That Preserved It

When we stand back and consider this whole long history, what strikes us most is the faithful providence of God running through it all. The God who inspired these Scriptures did not then leave them to the mercy of chance. The same God who gave the books also watched over the slow work of their recognition, and guarded them through the centuries, so that His people came to possess, recognize, and preserve exactly the Word He intended them to have. Kingdoms rose and fell, the people went into exile and returned, wars and upheavals swept over the ancient world — and through it all the sacred writings were kept and handed down. This is no small thing to notice. The very existence of our Old Testament, recognized and preserved across a thousand years and more of turbulent history, is itself a quiet testimony to the care of God for His Word. He did not give His revelation only to let it be lost; He gave it, and He kept it, and He brought it safely down to us. The canon of the Old Testament stands as a monument to the faithfulness of the God who speaks, and who preserves what He has spoken.

8.The Word That Points to Christ

Finally, we must not lose sight of what all these Scriptures are for. The Old Testament is not merely an ancient record to be studied for its own sake; it is the living Word of God, and, the apostle tells us, "all Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable" to teach us and train us in righteousness. But above all, the Old Testament has one great subject, toward whom the whole of it points: the Lord Jesus Christ. He Himself told His disciples that the Law, the Prophets, and the Psalms were written concerning Him, and He opened the Scriptures to show how they spoke of His suffering and glory. He said to those who searched the Scriptures diligently, "these are they which testify of Me." The Old Testament, then, is the first great half of one unified story, the long preparation for the coming of the Savior; and it finds its meaning and its fulfillment in Him. When we read it, we are not merely learning the history of an ancient people; we are following the golden thread of promise that leads, through law and prophet and psalm, to Christ. To receive the Old Testament as God's Word is, in the end, to be led by it to the One of whom it speaks.

9.Taking It to Heart

For reflection. Does it change how you hold your Bible to know that its books were recognized as God's Word, not invented by human decree? How does the witness of Jesus Himself to the Old Testament strengthen your confidence in it? And do you read the Old Testament looking for the Christ to whom it points, or only as ancient history?

Source. A Chapala Theological Seminary study of the Old Testament canon, anchored in the classic public-domain works on the subject (William Henry Green's General Introduction to the Old Testament: The Canon, Ira Maurice Price's The Ancestry of Our English Bible, and others), and in Scripture. This is CTS-authored teaching, not a reproduction; the classic works are freely available.

About the guides. This reading draws especially on William Henry Green's General Introduction to the Old Testament: The Canon and Ira Maurice Price's The Ancestry of Our English Bible, both in the public domain.

Reading 2 · The New Testament Canon

The Making of the New Testament Canon

The books of the new covenant written in the apostolic age; built on the apostles, whom Christ commissioned and His Spirit led; received as Scripture from the first; the continuous witness of the early church; why the canon had to be defined (to guard against spurious writings); how genuine Scripture was recognized; recognition not creation — the councils recognizing rather than conferring; and the New Testament as the apostolic witness to Christ.

CTS DIGESTRead the full digest — opens right here
The Chapala Theological Seminary digest — an original summary written by CTS, available in English, Spanish and French, readable offline. This is the CTS digest, not the full original source text.

The Making of the New Testament Canon

A Chapala Theological Seminary reading — how the writings of the apostles were recognized as the Word of God

A CTS-authored survey, anchored in the classic public-domain works on the New Testament canon (Brooke Foss Westcott, Ira Maurice Price, and others), and in Scripture.

  • How We Got the Bible
  • The New Testament Canon
  • The Apostolic Witness
  • Anchored in classics
A word before you read. How did the church come to possess the twenty-seven books of the New Testament, and to know them as the Word of God? This reading follows that history — the writing of the apostolic books, their reception in the early churches, and the way the church came to recognize the genuine Scriptures from among many other writings. Here too, the church did not create the canon, but received what God had given.

1.The Books of the New Covenant

The New Testament, like the Old, is a collection of books, written over a much shorter span — the span of a single lifetime or so, in the first century after Christ. There are the four Gospels, which record the life, teaching, death, and resurrection of the Lord Jesus; the book of Acts, which tells of the birth and spread of the early church; the letters of the apostle Paul to churches and to individuals; the other letters written by apostles and their companions to the churches at large; and finally the book of Revelation. These books were written in the days of the apostles, by the apostles themselves or by men closely associated with them, and under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. They were not written as abstract treatises, but arose out of the life and needs of the early church: to preserve the record of the gospel, to teach the young churches the faith, to correct errors, and to encourage believers under trial. Yet in and through these very practical writings, God was giving to His church a new body of Scripture, the written witness to His Son, to stand alongside the Scriptures of the Old Covenant. This is the New Testament, and our reading now asks how the church came to gather and recognize it.

2.Built on the Apostles

To understand the authority of the New Testament, we must begin with the apostles, for the New Testament rests upon them. The Lord Jesus chose these men, trained them, made them the eyewitnesses of His ministry and resurrection, and gave them a unique commission to be His representatives and to found His church. And He gave them a remarkable promise: that the Holy Spirit would come upon them, would lead them into all truth, and would bring to their remembrance all that He had taught them. The teaching of the apostles, therefore, carried the very authority of Christ Himself, for they spoke and wrote as those He had appointed and His Spirit guided. The early church knew this, and from the very beginning it "continued steadfastly in the apostles' doctrine," receiving their teaching as binding and authoritative. This is why apostolic origin became the great mark of a true New Testament book. A writing was recognized as Scripture if it came from an apostle, or from one who wrote under apostolic authority and set forth the apostolic message. The foundation of the church, as Paul says, is the apostles and prophets, with Christ Himself as the cornerstone; and the New Testament is the enduring written deposit of that apostolic foundation.

3.Received from the First

It is important to see that the books of the New Testament were treated as authoritative from very early times — not first honored centuries later, but received as the word of God almost as soon as they were written. Paul's letters, for instance, were read aloud in the gatherings of the churches, passed from one congregation to another, and gathered into collections. He directed that his letters be read publicly, and that they be shared among the churches. The Gospels, likewise, were treasured, copied, and read in worship. Strikingly, we can see this recognition happening even within the pages of the New Testament itself. One apostle refers to the letters of Paul and speaks of them in the same breath as "the other Scriptures," placing them alongside the Old Testament. Another quotes a saying from Luke's Gospel and introduces it with the words "the Scripture says." In other words, the earliest Christians did not regard these apostolic writings as merely useful human documents; they received them, from the first, as the Word of God, on a level with the sacred Scriptures they had always known. The authority of the New Testament books was not a later invention, but was acknowledged from the beginning.

4.The Witness of the Early Church

The historical evidence for all this is rich, and it was patiently gathered by careful scholars such as Brooke Foss Westcott, whose great survey traced the history of the New Testament canon through the writings of the early church. When we read the Christian writers of the generations immediately following the apostles, we find them quoting, echoing, and referring to the books of the New Testament again and again. The men who led the churches in those early centuries knew these books, used them, appealed to them, and passed them on. This continuous chain of testimony, running back to the apostolic age itself, shows that the New Testament writings were known and honored throughout the church from the earliest times. It was not that these books lay forgotten and were suddenly discovered late in history; rather, they were in constant use in the churches from the beginning, read in worship, cited in teaching, and appealed to in every controversy. The historical record, carefully examined, gives us solid ground for confidence: the books we now hold as the New Testament are the same books that the earliest generations of Christians received and treasured as the Word of God.

5.Why the Canon Had to Be Defined

If these books were recognized so early, we might ask why the church later found it necessary to draw up formal lists of the canon at all. The answer lies in certain pressures that arose as the church grew. For one thing, false writings began to appear — spurious "gospels" and letters that claimed to come from apostles but did not, some of them promoting strange or heretical ideas. The people of God needed to be able to distinguish clearly the genuine apostolic Scriptures from these counterfeits. For another, various teachers arose who rejected some of the true books, or who tried to add their own, and the church had to answer them by affirming plainly which writings were truly Scripture. So the drawing up of the canon was not the church arbitrarily deciding what would count as the Bible; it was the church, under pressure, carefully identifying and publicly affirming the books it had all along received, in order to guard the flock from error. The definition of the canon was, in a sense, an act of protection — a marking-off of the true Word of God from the false, so that believers might know with confidence which writings they could trust as the voice of God.

6.How Genuine Scripture Was Known

By what marks, then, did the church recognize which books were truly Scripture? Several tests, or rather several signs of recognition, were applied together. The first and chief was apostolic origin: did the book come from an apostle, or from a close associate writing with apostolic authority? The second was the witness of the churches: was the book widely and consistently received and used among the churches, especially those founded by the apostles? The third was consistency with the apostolic faith: did the book agree with the teaching that the apostles had everywhere delivered, the "rule of faith"? And underlying all these was a further reality: the genuine Scriptures carried in themselves the marks of the Word of God, and were recognized as such by His people, taught by His Spirit. It is important to see that these were not arbitrary tests by which the church created Scripture, but ways of recognizing what was already, in itself, the Word of God. The church was not manufacturing authority, but discerning it — carefully, prayerfully, and together — so as to acknowledge the books that God had in fact given.

7.Recognized, Not Created

The actual course of recognition unfolded much as we might expect. The great core of the New Testament — the four Gospels, the book of Acts, and the letters of Paul — was recognized very early and very widely, received without serious question throughout the churches. A smaller number of books were discussed for a longer time in some quarters before being universally received; among these were such books as Hebrews, James, Second Peter, the shorter letters of John, Jude, and Revelation. This is not a cause for anxiety, but rather a sign of the care with which the church proceeded; it did not receive books hastily or carelessly, but weighed them, until in due time the whole church came to a settled agreement upon the twenty-seven books. And when at length church councils drew up their formal lists of the canon, they were not creating the canon or granting authority to the books by their decree. They were recognizing and formally acknowledging the books that the churches had already long received and used as Scripture. Here is the same principle we saw with the Old Testament: the canon was recognized, not created. And it is worth noting, as a matter of thankfulness, that the twenty-seven books of the New Testament are received in common across the great branches of the Christian family — a wide and precious agreement.

8.The Apostolic Witness to Christ

What, in the end, is this New Testament that the church received? It is the apostolic witness to Jesus Christ. In the four Gospels we have the record of His life, His teaching, His death, and His rising again, given to us by those who saw and heard, or who gathered the testimony of those who did. In the Acts and the Epistles we have the Spirit-taught unfolding of the meaning of His coming — who He is, what He has done, and what it means to belong to Him. And in the book of Revelation we have the promise of His final triumph. From beginning to end, the New Testament has one great subject: the Lord Jesus Christ, crucified, risen, and reigning. We may hold it, therefore, with deep confidence and deeper gratitude. It is not a collection of legends that grew up long after the events, but the trustworthy testimony of the apostolic age, recognized and preserved by the church, and handed down to us. In it, the living Christ still speaks to His people. To receive the New Testament as the Word of God is to receive the faithful witness of those who knew Him, and, through their words, to meet the Savior Himself.

9.Taking It to Heart

For reflection. Does it strengthen your trust to learn that the New Testament books were received as Scripture from the earliest times, not invented later? How does the careful way the church recognized the canon — guarding against false writings — deepen your confidence in the books you hold? And do you come to the New Testament to meet the living Christ to whom it bears witness?

Source. A Chapala Theological Seminary study of the New Testament canon, anchored in the classic public-domain works on the subject (Brooke Foss Westcott's A General Survey of the History of the Canon of the New Testament, Ira Maurice Price's The Ancestry of Our English Bible, and others), and in Scripture. This is CTS-authored teaching, not a reproduction; the classic works are freely available.

About the guides. This reading draws especially on Brooke Foss Westcott's A General Survey of the History of the Canon of the New Testament and Ira Maurice Price's The Ancestry of Our English Bible, both in the public domain.

Reading 3 · Manuscripts and Transmission

How the Text Was Preserved

The autographs long perished, the text handed down through centuries of hand-copying; the scribes’ reverent labor; the wealth of witnesses (the Bible the best-attested writing of antiquity); the great ancient manuscripts; how variations arose, stated honestly but in true proportion (no doctrine at stake); textual comparison; the traditional and critical approaches presented evenhandedly, with the confidence that God has preserved His Word, which stands forever.

CTS DIGESTRead the full digest — opens right here
The Chapala Theological Seminary digest — an original summary written by CTS, available in English, Spanish and French, readable offline. This is the CTS digest, not the full original source text.

How the Text Was Preserved

A Chapala Theological Seminary reading — manuscripts, copying, and the faithful transmission of the Scriptures

A CTS-authored survey, anchored in the classic public-domain works on the biblical text (Frederic G. Kenyon, F. H. A. Scrivener, John William Burgon and Edward Miller, and others), and in Scripture.

  • How We Got the Bible
  • Manuscripts and Transmission
  • Preservation
  • Anchored in classics
A word before you read. Between the biblical authors and our own Bibles lie many centuries of faithful hand-copying. This reading considers how the text was preserved: the manuscripts, the labor of the scribes, the wealth of evidence, and the way scholars work to establish the text. It touches, gently and fairly, the differences among sincere Christians on these matters — and rests, above all, on the confidence that God has preserved His Word.

1.From the Author's Hand to Ours

We begin with a fact that surprises many: the original documents penned by the biblical writers — what scholars call the autographs — have not survived. This is not strange, for they were written on perishable materials, chiefly papyrus, which does not last for many centuries in ordinary conditions. What we possess instead are copies: manuscripts written by hand, copied from earlier manuscripts, which were themselves copied from earlier ones still, in a long chain reaching back toward the originals. For all the centuries before the invention of printing, every single copy of the Scriptures had to be made painstakingly by hand, letter by letter and line by line. This means that the Bible has come down to us through a long process of transmission, from copy to copy across the generations. And this at once raises the question that this reading seeks to answer: if we no longer have the originals, and the text was copied by hand for so long, how can we be confident that the Bible we hold today faithfully preserves what the biblical authors actually wrote? The answer, as we shall see, is deeply reassuring; but it begins with understanding how the copying was done.

2.Scribes and Their Labor

The work of copying the Scriptures was carried out by scribes, and it was a labor of great patience and, very often, of great reverence. In the earliest times the Scriptures were written on papyrus, and later on the more durable parchment or vellum, made from animal skins. Every copy had to be produced slowly by hand, and the copying of a whole book was the work of many days or weeks. Those who did this work for the sacred writings frequently regarded it as a holy task, to be done with the utmost care. The Jewish scribes who copied the Old Testament were especially famous for the meticulous rules they developed to guard the accuracy of their work — counting the letters and lines, checking and re-checking, treating the smallest details of the text as sacred and not to be altered. Christian scribes, too, copied the New Testament writings with reverence and care. This does not mean that no mistakes were ever made, for the copyists were human and the labor was long; but it does mean that the transmission of the Scriptures was, on the whole, carried out with a seriousness and devotion befitting the Word of God. The text was not handled carelessly, but was reverently guarded and passed on.

3.A Wealth of Witnesses

Here we come to one of the most important and encouraging facts of all. The Bible, and especially the New Testament, is supported by an abundance of manuscript evidence that is without parallel among the writings of the ancient world. Where many famous works of antiquity survive in only a handful of copies, often made a thousand years or more after the original, the Greek New Testament survives in thousands upon thousands of manuscripts, some of them very early, together with thousands more copies of ancient translations into other languages, and countless quotations of the text in the writings of the early church. The Old Testament, for its part, was transmitted with extraordinary fidelity by the Jewish scribes across the centuries. This great wealth of witnesses is a tremendous strength, not a weakness. For the more copies we possess, the more securely the true text is preserved among them, and the better we are able to compare them and recover what the authors wrote. No other book from the ancient world is anywhere near as well attested. Far from having a poorly preserved text, we possess in the Bible the best-attested writings to have come down to us from antiquity, by a very wide margin.

4.The Great Ancient Manuscripts

Scholars such as Frederic Kenyon devoted their lives to studying and describing these manuscripts, and it is worth knowing a little of the principal witnesses. For the New Testament, there survive both very old fragments and copies written on papyrus, some reaching back close to the early centuries, and great complete manuscripts, written on parchment, that preserve large portions or the whole of the text. These ancient books are among the most precious treasures in the libraries of the world. For the Old Testament, the carefully preserved manuscripts of the Jewish scribes long provided the standard text; and in more recent times, the discovery of very ancient scrolls, hidden away for many centuries, allowed scholars to compare copies separated by a thousand years, and confirmed how faithfully the Old Testament text had been handed down over that long span. In every case, the study of the actual manuscripts has served to strengthen, not to weaken, our confidence in the text. The witnesses are many, some are ancient, and together they allow us to know, with a high degree of certainty, what the Scriptures originally said. This is the material with which the careful work of preserving and establishing the text is done.

5.How Variations Arose

We must be honest and straightforward about one thing: because the Scriptures were copied by hand over so many centuries, small differences among the copies — what scholars call variant readings — did arise, as they inevitably do in any hand-copied text. A scribe's eye might slip from one word to a similar word further on; a word might be misheard if copying was done from dictation; spellings might differ; occasionally a word or phrase might be accidentally omitted or repeated. This is simply the nature of hand-copying, and it would be dishonest to pretend it never happened. But it is just as important to see these variations in their true proportion, for here much needless alarm has been caused by exaggeration. The overwhelming majority of these differences are utterly trivial — matters of spelling, word order, and the like — that do not affect the meaning at all and often cannot even be shown in translation. And this is the crucial point: no doctrine of the Christian faith, not one, hangs upon any of the small number of genuinely uncertain readings. The great truths of the gospel are taught clearly and repeatedly throughout the Scriptures, and rest secure, wholly untouched by any question about the wording of a particular verse.

6.Comparing the Witnesses

How, then, do scholars work to establish the true text where the copies differ? This careful discipline is called textual criticism, and, despite its name, it is not a criticizing of the Bible but a serving of it — the patient work of comparing the many manuscripts in order to determine, as accurately as possible, what the original text said. And here again the wealth of evidence is a great help. Precisely because we possess so many witnesses, the true reading is almost always preserved among them, and can be identified by careful comparison. Where copies differ, the scholar weighs the evidence of the various manuscripts, considers which reading best explains the others, and seeks to recover the original wording. In the vast majority of cases, the evidence points clearly, and the text can be established with confidence. Only in a small number of places is there any real uncertainty, and even there, as we have said, nothing of importance to faith or life is at stake. This work has been carried on by devout and careful scholars for centuries, and its overall result is to give us great confidence that, in the Bible we hold, we possess a faithful and accurate representation of what the biblical authors wrote.

7.Two Approaches, One Confidence

It should be said honestly that sincere and godly Christians have not all agreed on the best method of weighing the manuscripts, and it is fitting to describe the difference fairly. One approach, often called the traditional or majority-text view, gives particular weight to the great mass of manuscripts, which agree closely with one another and which lie behind the text known as the Received Text; this is the stream of text underlying the King James Version, the New King James Version, and the Reina-Valera family of Spanish Bibles. Able scholars such as Burgon and Miller defended this position, arguing that the text preserved in the majority of the witnesses best represents the original. Another approach, often called the critical or eclectic view, gives greater weight to the oldest surviving manuscripts, on the principle that copies nearer in time to the originals are less likely to have gathered changes; this approach lies behind most modern critical editions. Both approaches are held by faithful believers who reverence the Scriptures, and the difference between them, while real, touches only a limited portion of the text. The translations used in this seminary's courses, the New King James Version and the Reina-Valera Gómez, stand within the traditional stream. But whichever approach one follows, the area of agreement is vast, and the essential message of Scripture is in no way in doubt.

8.The Word That Endures

When we take in this whole history, what shines through it is the faithful providence of God in preserving His Word. The same God who breathed out the Scriptures did not abandon them to be lost through the long centuries of copying; He watched over their transmission, so that His Word has been handed down to us, not corrupted beyond recovery, but faithfully preserved. The very abundance of manuscripts, which some might have imagined a problem, is in truth part of God's preserving care, spreading His Word so widely across the world that it could never be lost or suppressed. And so the ancient promise stands confirmed by history itself: "The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God stands forever." Our Lord said that heaven and earth would pass away, but His words would never pass away; and they have not. We may therefore hold our Bibles with full confidence and deep gratitude — confidence that we possess a faithful and reliable text of the Word of God, and gratitude for the long labor of countless faithful scribes and scholars through whom it has come. And this preserved and trustworthy Word is precious above all because in it the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ comes to us undimmed, the good news that endures forever.

9.Taking It to Heart

For reflection. Does it strengthen your confidence to learn that the Bible is the best-attested writing of the ancient world, preserved in a great wealth of manuscripts? How does it steady your heart to know that no doctrine of the faith rests on any uncertain reading? And can you rest in the promise that the Word of our God stands forever, faithfully preserved and handed down to you?

Source. A Chapala Theological Seminary study of the transmission of the biblical text, anchored in the classic public-domain works on the subject (Frederic G. Kenyon's Our Bible and the Ancient Manuscripts, F. H. A. Scrivener's A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament, John William Burgon and Edward Miller's The Traditional Text of the Holy Gospels, and others), and in Scripture. This is CTS-authored teaching, not a reproduction; the classic works are freely available.

About the guides. This reading draws especially on Frederic G. Kenyon's Our Bible and the Ancient Manuscripts and F. H. A. Scrivener's A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament, both in the public domain.

Reading 4 · The Bible in Translation

From Ancient Tongues to Our Own

The Scriptures written in Hebrew and Greek, needing translation to reach the peoples; the ancient versions (the Septuagint, Jerome’s Vulgate); the English Bible — Wycliffe and Tyndale, and the line to the King James and NKJV; the Spanish Bible — Reina and Valera and the Reina-Valera Gómez; the great cost at which the Bible was bought, the labor that continues today; and the treasure now in our own tongue, given to reveal Christ to every people.

CTS DIGESTRead the full digest — opens right here
The Chapala Theological Seminary digest — an original summary written by CTS, available in English, Spanish and French, readable offline. This is the CTS digest, not the full original source text.

From Ancient Tongues to Our Own

A Chapala Theological Seminary reading — how the Scriptures came to be read in the languages of the peoples

A CTS-authored survey, anchored in the classic public-domain works on the history of the Bible in translation (Ira Maurice Price and others), and in Scripture.

  • How We Got the Bible
  • The Bible in Translation
  • The Word for the Peoples
  • Anchored in classics
A word before you read. The Bible was not written in English or Spanish, but in Hebrew and Greek. That we can read it in our own language is the fruit of a long and often costly labor of translation, carried on by devoted men and women who longed for ordinary people to have God's Word. This reading traces that story — the ancient versions, the English Bible, the Spanish Bible — and the treasure it has placed in our hands.

1.Written in Hebrew and Greek

The Bible came into the world in particular human languages. The Old Testament was written almost entirely in Hebrew, the language of ancient Israel, with a few portions in the closely related Aramaic. The New Testament was written in Greek, which in the days of the apostles was the common language of much of the ancient world. This means that, for anyone who did not read Hebrew or Greek, the Scriptures had to be translated into their own tongue if they were ever to read the Word of God for themselves. And so, from very early times, there has been a great and continuing labor of translation, the work of carrying the Scriptures over from the original languages into the many languages that people actually speak. The whole story of "how we got the Bible" in our own hands, in a language we can understand, is the story of this labor. It is a story that runs across many centuries and many lands, and it is, at its heart, a story of love for the Word of God and for the people who needed it. In this reading we follow that story, and give thanks for it.

2.The Ancient Versions

The translation of the Scriptures began long before our own languages existed. Among the earliest and most important of all translations was the rendering of the Hebrew Old Testament into Greek, made in the centuries before Christ and commonly known as the Septuagint. This Greek Old Testament was widely used in the days of the apostles and by the early church, and it opened the Hebrew Scriptures to the whole Greek-speaking world. As the church spread westward, the Scriptures were translated into Latin, and these Latin versions were eventually brought together and refined, most famously in the great work of Jerome, whose Latin Bible, the Vulgate, served the churches of the West for many centuries and nourished the faith of countless believers. The Scriptures were also translated early into Syriac, Coptic, and other tongues of the ancient world. These ancient versions did a double service: they carried the Word of God to peoples who could not read the original languages, and, as very old translations, they also stand today as valuable witnesses to the text of Scripture. From the earliest ages, then, the impulse was already at work to bring the Bible to the peoples in a language they could understand.

3.The Bible for the People

Running through the whole history of translation is a deep and recurring conviction: that the Word of God is meant for the people, and ought to be available to ordinary men and women in the language they speak and understand. The Scriptures themselves point in this direction. When the Law was read to the people after the return from exile, we are told that the readers gave the sense, so that the people understood the reading; the goal was not merely to recite the words, but that the hearers should grasp their meaning. The Word of God is not meant to be locked away in a language that only scholars can read; it is meant to be a lamp to the feet and a light to the path of every believer, near to us, in our mouth and in our heart. This conviction, that the plowman and the shopkeeper and the mother at home should be able to read God's Word for themselves, has been the driving force behind the great translators of history. They labored, often against great difficulty, out of a burning desire that the common people might have the Scriptures in their own tongue, and so might hear God speak to them directly through His Word.

4.The English Bible: Wycliffe and Tyndale

The story of the English Bible is a stirring one, and two names stand out at its beginning. In the fourteenth century, John Wycliffe and his followers produced the first complete Bible in the English language, translated from the Latin, out of a deep desire that the English people should have the Scriptures for themselves. These handwritten Bibles were treasured and copied, and Wycliffe has been remembered ever since as a morning star of the English Bible. Then, in the sixteenth century, came William Tyndale, one of the greatest of all translators of Scripture into English. Tyndale translated the New Testament, and much of the Old, directly from the original Greek and Hebrew, and, with the new invention of printing, his English New Testament could be produced and spread as never before. Tyndale carried on his work at enormous personal cost, in exile and danger, and in the end he gave his very life for it, dying as a martyr. He is said to have longed that even the boy who drives the plow might come to know the Scriptures as well as the learned. His translation was so faithful and so beautifully wrought that it shaped all the great English Bibles that came after it, and its words echo in our English Bibles to this day.

5.From Tyndale to the King James

Tyndale's labor bore fruit far beyond his own lifetime. In the years that followed, a series of English Bibles appeared, each building upon the work of those before, until in the year 1611 there was published the translation that would become the great standard English Bible for centuries to come: the King James Version, or Authorized Version. This translation drew deeply upon Tyndale and the other earlier English Bibles, gathering up their best labors into a single dignified and enduring version. For generations upon generations of English-speaking believers, the King James Bible was simply "the Bible," read in churches and homes, memorized and loved, its language woven into the very fabric of the English tongue. In more recent times, that great translation has been carefully revised and updated into more modern English, so that its faithfulness might be joined to language more readily understood today. The New King James Version, which the courses of this seminary use, stands in that honored line, preserving the traditional stream of text and much of the beauty of the older version, while rendering it in clearer modern speech. Through this long succession, the labor of Tyndale and the rest continues to bless English readers still.

6.The Spanish Bible: Reina and Valera

The Spanish-speaking world has its own noble history of the Bible, and it deserves to be told alongside the English. In the sixteenth century, Casiodoro de Reina devoted years of labor to translating the whole Bible into Spanish, and his complete Spanish Bible appeared in 1569; it is often affectionately remembered by the little bear on its title page. Some years later, Cipriano de Valera carried out a careful revision of Reina's work, published in 1602. Together their names became joined to the great and beloved standard Spanish Bible, the Reina-Valera, which across the centuries has been revised again and again while keeping its essential character, and which has been the Bible of countless Spanish-speaking believers down to our own day. The courses of this seminary use the Reina-Valera Gómez, a modern revision standing in this long and honored tradition and within the traditional stream of text. Like their counterparts in other lands, Reina and Valera labored at great cost, often in exile and hardship, moved by the same conviction that the Spanish-speaking peoples should have the Word of God in their own beautiful language. To them the Spanish-speaking church owes a lasting debt of gratitude.

7.Bought at Great Cost

When we consider this whole history, one thing stands out above all: the great cost at which the Bible in our own tongue was bought for us. The translation of the Scriptures is itself a demanding labor, requiring deep learning in the original languages, painstaking care, and long years of devoted work. But beyond the labor of translation, there is the sacrifice of the translators themselves. Again and again in history, those who sought to bring the Scriptures to the people paid a heavy price for it — enduring poverty, exile, imprisonment, and sometimes death. That men were willing to suffer and even to die so that others might read the Word of God is a striking testimony to how precious that Word is, and how deeply they believed that ordinary people needed it. We can hardly read of their courage without being humbled, and without loving our own Bibles the more for the great price at which they were bought. Nor is this labor finished. To this very day, devoted translators and missionaries are still at work, carrying the Scriptures into more and more of the world's thousands of languages, so that every people on earth may at last be able to read God's Word in the language of their own hearts. The task that Wycliffe and Tyndale and Reina began goes on, and it is one of the great ongoing labors of the church.

8.A Treasure in Our Own Tongue

All of this should fill us with wonder and gratitude for the Bible we so easily hold in our hands. We who can pick up the Scriptures and read them in our own language possess a treasure that many in history longed for and could not have, and that was purchased for us at a cost we can scarcely imagine. It would be a great shame to hold so precious and so dearly-bought a gift, and then to leave it unopened and unread. Rather, knowing what it cost to place the Bible in our own tongue, let us treasure it, read it daily, hide its words in our hearts, and let it be the lamp to our feet that God intended it to be. And let us never forget what the whole long labor of translation was ultimately for. It was not merely to spread a book, but to bring to the peoples of the earth the Word that reveals the Lord Jesus Christ, so that men and women of every language might hear the gospel and come to know the Savior. One day, the Scriptures tell us, a great multitude from every nation and tribe and people and tongue will stand before God; and every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord. The labor of translation is a part of that great work, bringing the good news of Christ to every language under heaven.

9.Taking It to Heart

For reflection. Do you treasure the Bible in your own language as the dearly-bought gift it is — and do you open and read it as it deserves? What does the sacrifice of the translators teach you about the worth of God's Word? And do you remember that the whole labor of translation was to bring you, and every people, the Word that reveals Christ?

Source. A Chapala Theological Seminary study of the Bible in translation, anchored in the classic public-domain works on the subject (Ira Maurice Price's The Ancestry of Our English Bible and others), and in Scripture. This is CTS-authored teaching, not a reproduction; the classic works are freely available.

About the guides. This reading draws especially on Ira Maurice Price's The Ancestry of Our English Bible, in the public domain.

Reading 5 · Archaeology and Reliability

Does the Evidence Stand?

The capstone: the Bible rooted in real, testable history; the light archaeology has shed on its world; the many cases where discovery confirmed details once doubted; the New Testament’s accuracy in its Roman world; an honest reckoning of what evidence can and cannot do; the right relation of faith and evidence (faith rests on God, not on what is dug from the ground); and the synthesis of the whole course — God’s preserved, trustworthy Word that points to Christ.

CTS DIGESTRead the full digest — opens right here
The Chapala Theological Seminary digest — an original summary written by CTS, available in English, Spanish and French, readable offline. This is the CTS digest, not the full original source text.

Does the Evidence Stand?

A Chapala Theological Seminary reading — archaeology, history, and the reliability of the Scripture record

A CTS-authored survey, anchored in the classic public-domain works on the historical evidences for Scripture (George Rawlinson, A. H. Sayce, Camden M. Cobern, and others), and in Scripture.

  • How We Got the Bible
  • Archaeology and History
  • The Reliability of Scripture
  • Capstone
A word before you read. The Bible is rooted in real history, and so its record can be tested against what we learn of the ancient world. This closing reading considers how archaeology and history bear upon Scripture — how they illumine and often confirm it, and also what such evidence can and cannot do. And it draws together the whole course, that we may hold the Bible as the trustworthy Word of God, which leads us to Christ.

1.A Book Rooted in History

One of the striking things about the Bible is that it is not detached from history or set in some vague never-land, but is firmly rooted in real history. Its story unfolds in actual places that can be found on a map, among real peoples and nations, under named kings and rulers, in the settled world of the ancient Near East and, later, the Roman Empire. The Bible names cities and countries, records wars and treaties, and dates its events by the reigns of kings. This historical rootedness is a remarkable feature, and it has an important consequence: because the Bible speaks of real people and events in the real world, its record can be tested and compared against what we can learn of that world from other sources — from the writings of ancient historians, and above all from the discoveries of archaeology. Because the Bible locates its claims in identifiable times and places, it plants itself squarely in history and invites examination. In this closing reading, we ask how the biblical record has fared under such examination, and what we may reasonably conclude from it.

2.Light from the Ancient World

The first and greatest gift that archaeology has given to the study of the Bible is light. Over the past two centuries, the patient work of uncovering the ancient world — the digging out of buried cities, the recovery of monuments and inscriptions, the deciphering of long-forgotten languages, the unearthing of clay tablets and documents by the thousands — has poured a flood of light upon the world in which the biblical story took place. Where once the background of the Scriptures was dim and little understood, we now know a great deal about the peoples, the customs, the laws, the daily life, and the great empires among which the events of the Bible unfolded. This has been an immense help to understanding the Scriptures. Passages that were once obscure become clear when we understand the customs they assume; the actions of biblical characters make sense against the background of their times; the whole world of the Bible has become vivid and real to us in a way it could not be before. Even apart from any question of proving or disproving, this illumination is a great benefit, for it helps us read the Scriptures with far deeper understanding of the world in which God gave them.

3.Where the Critics Doubted

Beyond illuminating the Bible's world, the discoveries of archaeology have in many cases confirmed details of the biblical record itself. Kings, peoples, cities, and events that were once known only from the pages of Scripture have been found named and attested in ancient inscriptions and remains dug from the ground. This has proved significant, because at various times critics had doubted the accuracy of the Bible on just such points. Certain peoples mentioned in the Scriptures were said by some scholars never to have existed; certain kings were dismissed as unhistorical; certain cities were thought to be inventions. And then, again and again, the discoveries of the archaeologists brought to light the very peoples, kings, and cities that had been doubted, showing that the biblical record had been accurate all along, and that the skepticism had been premature. This has happened often enough to teach an important lesson in caution: that where the Bible's account has seemed to stand alone and unsupported, it is wiser not to rush to declare it mistaken, for the evidence still hidden in the ground has a way of vindicating the ancient record. Time and again, the Bible has been confirmed where it was doubted.

4.The Verdict of the Monuments

In the nineteenth century, as the great monuments and inscriptions of the ancient empires were deciphered and read, scholars such as A. H. Sayce spoke of "the verdict of the monuments" — the testimony that these ancient records gave concerning the history of the Bible. And on the whole, that testimony proved supportive of the Scriptures. As the inscriptions of the ancient kingdoms were read, they were found again and again to fit with, and to confirm, the general historical framework that the Bible presents, and to tell against the sweeping skepticism of some critics of that age. We should state this carefully and without exaggeration: the evidence of the monuments did not, and could not, confirm every single detail of the biblical narrative, and honest scholars have continued to weigh and debate particular questions. But the broad tendency of the accumulating evidence was to confirm the general historical reliability of the biblical record, and to caution against the hasty assumption that the Bible must be wrong wherever it could not yet be checked. The ancient monuments, on the whole, spoke in the Bible's favor, and gave solid reason to treat its record as the work of careful and truthful writers.

5.The New Testament in Its World

What is true of the Old Testament holds also for the New. The events of the New Testament took place in the well-documented world of the Roman Empire, a world we know a great deal about from many sources. And when the New Testament's many references to that world are examined — its mentions of emperors and governors and local officials, its notes on cities and provinces and customs, its picture of the political and social order of the day — they are found, over and over, to be accurate. The writer Luke, who composed both his Gospel and the book of Acts, has been especially noted in this regard; his careful references to the titles of officials, the boundaries of provinces, and the details of travel and administration across the Roman world have repeatedly been confirmed, marking him as a careful and accurate historian. Scholars such as Camden Cobern gathered up the many ways in which archaeological discovery bears upon the New Testament and illuminates its background. Here again, the effect of careful examination has been to confirm the impression that the New Testament writers were not spinners of legends, but sober witnesses who set their testimony to Christ firmly within the real history of their time.

6.What the Evidence Can and Cannot Do

Here we must speak with care and honesty, for it is easy to claim too much, and overstatement in the end does the truth no service. Archaeology and history can do a great deal: they can illuminate the world of the Bible, confirm many of its historical details, show that it is rooted in real events, and give us good reason to regard it as a careful and trustworthy record. This is no small thing. But there are also things that such evidence cannot do, and we must be honest about them. It cannot confirm every detail of the biblical story, for much of the ancient past has simply vanished, leaving no trace behind; the absence of evidence for some event is not proof that it did not happen. And, far more importantly, no amount of digging in the ground can prove the deepest things the Bible declares — that God spoke to the prophets, that Christ rose from the dead, that we are saved by His grace. These are truths of a different order, which archaeology, by its very nature, cannot reach. Some historical questions, too, remain genuinely open, and evidence is always partial. So the evidence of history is a real and valuable support, and a healthy caution against hasty skepticism; but it is not the foundation on which the Bible's authority finally rests.

7.Faith and Evidence

How, then, should we understand the relation between such evidence and our faith? The evidence of history and archaeology is a genuine help to faith. It clears away false objections, answers the charge that the Bible is a book of mere legends, and confirms that the Scriptures are trustworthy as a historical record, the work of truthful writers. All this strengthens our confidence and removes hindrances to belief. Yet we must not imagine that faith is merely the conclusion of an argument from evidence, as though we believed the Bible only because the archaeologists had proved it. Faith, in the biblical sense, is not that; it is trust in God Himself, awakened in the heart by His Word and His Spirit. The early believers received the message "not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God" — and they knew it to be so not chiefly through external proofs, but through the power of the Word itself upon their hearts. So the evidence does its proper work in clearing the ground and strengthening confidence; but in the end we believe because God has spoken, and His Word carries its own authority and its own light, shining like a lamp in a dark place. Evidence supports our faith; but our faith rests upon God.

8.The Whole Story, and Its Center

And now we may draw together the whole of this course, for we have followed a single great story. We saw how God gave the Old Testament and guided His people to recognize it; how the writings of the apostles were received as the New Testament; how the text was faithfully copied and preserved across the centuries; how it was carried, at great cost, into the languages of the peoples; and now, how it stands rooted in real and testable history. Each of these threads is a chapter in one story: the story of how God gave His Word to the world, and by His providence guarded it, spread it, and brought it safely into our hands. When we consider it all together, we are left holding a book unlike any other — inspired by God, recognized by His church, preserved through the ages, translated for the nations, and confirmed as trustworthy by history itself. We may hold such a book with deep confidence, reverence, and gratitude. And we must never forget what all of it is finally for. The whole purpose of this book, and of the whole long labor by which it came to us, is that we might know the Lord Jesus Christ. For the Scriptures, as the apostle says, are able to make us "wise for salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus." The written Word exists to lead us to the living Word; and to receive the Bible rightly is, in the end, to be led by it to the Savior of whom it speaks.

9.Taking It to Heart

For reflection. Does it strengthen your confidence to know that the Bible is rooted in real history and has so often been confirmed where it was doubted? Can you hold together both the value of the evidence and the truth that faith rests finally upon God, not upon what is dug from the ground? And in all your study of how we got the Bible, do you let it lead you to Christ, of whom it was given to make you wise for salvation?

Source. A Chapala Theological Seminary study of the historical evidences for Scripture, anchored in the classic public-domain works on the subject (George Rawlinson's The Historical Evidences of the Truth of the Scripture Records, A. H. Sayce's The Higher Criticism and the Verdict of the Monuments, Camden M. Cobern's The New Archaeological Discoveries and Their Bearing upon the New Testament, and others), and in Scripture. This is CTS-authored teaching, not a reproduction; the classic works are freely available. Readers should bear in mind that archaeological knowledge has continued to develop since these older works were written.

About the guides. This reading draws especially on George Rawlinson's The Historical Evidences of the Truth of the Scripture Records and Camden M. Cobern's The New Archaeological Discoveries and Their Bearing upon the New Testament, both in the public domain.

Record your reading

When you have read your three chosen readings in full, enter your name and affirm it below. This record is kept on your honor, in this browser; it shows on your certificate as with honors.

✓ Recorded — this class counts toward your With Honors progress. Reading With Honors ↗

Honors Reading — recorded

affirmed on to have read, in full:

    Further Study: Ten Public-Domain Works

    These ten works are for further study, for the student who wants to go on reading. They are not part of the honors reading above: that stays as it is — the five CTS digests, any three read in full and recorded on your honor. All ten are in the public domain; each link opens the work online, and most can also be found in the Internet Archive or Project Gutenberg. Most are in English: the Chrome browser can translate a page (right-click, “Translate to…”; on a phone, the browser menu).
    The Whole Story · From Manuscript to Translation
    1. The Ancestry of Our English Bible

    Price's classic tells the whole story of how our Bible came down to us — from the earliest manuscripts, through the ancient versions, to the translations we read today. It is the ideal companion to the entire course, weaving together the canon, the copying of the text, and the work of translation into one clear and readable account. For the student who wants to grasp the big picture before diving into details, there is no better place to begin: it shows that the Bible in your hands is the end of a long and faithful chain of witnesses.

    The Right Books · The Old Testament Canon
    2. General Introduction to the Old Testament: The Canon

    Green's careful study takes up the question of the Old Testament canon — how Israel came to recognize exactly these books as the Word of God, and no others. It richly serves the course's unit on the right books of the Old Testament, defending the integrity of the Hebrew Scriptures against the doubts raised in his day. This is a more technical work, offered for the student who wishes to go deeper; but it rewards the effort with a firm, well-reasoned confidence that the Old Testament we possess is the one God gave His people.

    The Right Books · The New Testament & the Apocrypha
    3. A History of the Canon of the New Testament

    Westcott's landmark work traces how the books of the New Testament were recognized by the early church — tested, received, and gathered as Scripture — and why the writings of the Apocrypha and later centuries were not. It is the ideal foundation for the course's unit on the New Testament canon, showing from the earliest testimony that the church did not create the canon but recognized the books God had given. Careful and scholarly, it lays to rest the notion that our New Testament was a late or arbitrary collection.

    The Witnesses · The Manuscripts
    4. Our Bible and the Ancient Manuscripts

    Kenyon, one of the great manuscript scholars, wrote this beloved introduction to the handwritten witnesses behind our Bible — how the text of both Testaments was copied, preserved, and recovered across the centuries. It is the perfect companion to the course's units on the copying of the text and the manuscript gallery, explaining clearly and without jargon what the great codices are and why they matter. More than any other single book, it shows the ordinary reader how astonishingly well-attested the Bible is compared to every other ancient writing.

    The Right Words · Establishing the Text
    5. A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament

    Scrivener's manual is the classic nineteenth-century guide to the textual criticism of the New Testament — the manuscripts, the versions, and the principles by which scholars weigh them. It deepens the course's units on the copying and the printed editions of the text, and holds a special interest: Scrivener was himself the editor of the Received Text that stands behind the King James and its heirs, yet a careful master of the wider evidence. This is technical study for the serious student, and a fair and learned guide to how the words of the New Testament are established.

    Two Printed Texts · The Traditional Text
    6. The Traditional Text of the Holy Gospels

    Dean Burgon was the most formidable defender of the traditional text of the Gospels — the reading found in the great majority of manuscripts and reflected in the Received Text — against the newer critical editions of his day. This work presents his scholarly case with learning and force. It directly serves the course's unit on the two printed texts, giving the strongest voice for the traditional side of a discussion that continues still. Read alongside the manuscript scholars, it lets the student weigh both traditions fairly and understand why the seminary reads from the New King James and the Reina-Valera Gómez.

    Stones That Speak · The Witness of Archaeology
    7. The 'Higher Criticism' and the Verdict of the Monuments

    Sayce, a pioneering Assyriologist, gathered the testimony of the ancient monuments — the inscriptions, tablets, and ruins unearthed across the Bible lands — and showed how repeatedly they confirmed the Old Testament record against the doubts of the critics. It is a vivid companion to the course's units on the witness of archaeology, letting the very stones speak. Some of its details have been refined by later discovery, but its great theme stands: as the spade has turned, again and again it has vindicated the history the Bible tells.

    A Land You Can Walk · Biblical Geography
    8. The Historical Geography of the Holy Land

    Smith's celebrated work walks the reader across the very land of the Bible — its hills and valleys, roads and rivers, cities and wilderness — showing how its geography shaped the history that unfolded upon it. It is the ideal companion to the course's unit on the land you can walk, making the stage of the biblical story real and vivid. The Bible is no myth set in no place; it happened here, on ground that can still be traced — and Smith is the classic guide to that ground.

    Can We Trust It? · The Historical Record
    9. The Historical Evidences of the Truth of the Scripture Records

    Rawlinson, a distinguished historian, set out the historical evidence for the truth of the Bible's record — testing its accounts against what is known of the ancient world from every other source. It speaks to the course's opening and closing questions: can we trust what we hold, and may we know it for certain? Measured and scholarly rather than heated, it shows that the Scriptures stand up as history — that the events they report belong not to legend but to the real past, confirmed again and again where they can be tested.

    The Spade Testifies · The New Testament World
    10. The New Archeological Discoveries and Their Bearing upon the New Testament

    Cobern brought together the discoveries that shed light on the New Testament — the ancient papyri, inscriptions, and everyday documents that illuminate its language, its world, and the reliability of its text. It complements the course's units on the manuscripts and on archaeology, extending the witness of the spade from the Old Testament into the New. Here the student sees how the buried evidence of the Roman world confirms the setting of the Gospels and Acts, and how the humble papyri recovered from the sands brought the very words of the New Testament into sharper light.

    Honor attestation: By selecting three readings above, you affirm that you have read those three digests in full. The digests are CTS-authored summaries that may include brief excerpts or adaptations of public-domain works.
    Chapala Theological Seminary · Further Study

    Further Study — Online

    Optional resources for students with internet access — How We Got the Bible

    ONLINE

    Requires an internet connection. These resources are hosted on the web and do not open offline. They supplement the course; they do not replace its units or exams.

    Free animated Bible videos

    BibleProject — Proyecto Biblia

    Video EnglishEspañol

    Short, well-crafted animated videos. In the video library, explore the videos on how the Bible came to us and what it is. Non-partisan and freely available.

    Instructor's vetted pick

    [ Your chosen video goes here ]

    A place for a specific video the instructor has watched and approved for this course.

    These optional supplements link to third-party websites that Chapala Theological Seminary does not control; weigh their content against Scripture and this course.